Table 4 MMAT
From: A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health
Bardosh et al. 2017 [16] | Brewster et al. 2015 [17] | Carrera et al. 2015 [18] | Frykman et al. 2014 [19] | Wiener-Ogilvie et al. 2008 [20] | Atkins et al. 2008 [21] | Baer et al. 2009 [22] | Bonetti et al. 2005 [23] | Garner et al. 2011 [24] | Glisson et al. 2010 [25] | Holth et al. 2011 [26] | Lee et al. 2018 [27] | Lochman et al. 2009 [28] | Rapkin et al. 2017 [29] | Rohrbach et al. 1993 [30] | Seys et al. 2018 [31] | Williams et al. 2014 [32] | Williams et al. 2017 [33] | |||
1. Qualitative | ||||||||||||||||||||
Data sources relevant? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
Data analysis process relevant? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
Findings relate to context? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
Findings relate to researchers' influence? | N | N | N | Y | N | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
2. Quantitative randomized | ||||||||||||||||||||
Clear description of the randomization? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N | N | Y | Y | N | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y | ||
Clear description of allocation or concealment? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N | N | N | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | ||
Complete outcome data? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | ||
Low withdrawal/drop-out? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | ||
Total score (%) | 75 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 25 | ||
Aarons et al. 2009 [34] | Becker et al. 2016 [35] | Beenstock et al. 2012 [36] | Beets et al. 2008 [37] | Bonetti et al. 2009 [38] | Chou et al. 2011 [39] | Cummings et al. 2017 [40] | David and Schiff 2017 [41] | Edmunds et al. 2014 [42] | Gnich et al. 2018 [43] | Guerrero et al. 2018 [44] | Huis et al. 2013 [45] | Little et al. 2015 [46] | Llasus et al. 2014 [47] | Nelson and Steele 2007 [48] | Potthoff et al. 2017 [49] | Presseau et al. 2016 [50] | Simmonds et al. 2012 [51] | Stockdale et al. 2018 [52] | Wanless et al. 2015 [53] | |
3. Quantitative - non-randomized | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment minimizes selection bias? | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Measurements appropriate? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Comparable groups or control for differences? | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Complete outcome data, acceptable response rate, or acceptable follow-up rate? | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | Y | N | N |
Total score (%) | 75 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 25 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 75 | 75 |
Armson et al. 2018 [54] | Birken et al. 2015 [55] | Kauth et al. 2010 [56] | Lukas et al. 2009 [57] | Panzano et al. 2012 [58] | Rangachari et al. 2015 [59] | Shrubsole et al. 2018 [60] | ||||||||||||||
1. Qualitative | ||||||||||||||||||||
Data sources relevant? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |||||||||||||
Data analysis process relevant? | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | |||||||||||||
Findings relate to context? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |||||||||||||
Findings relate to researchers' influence? | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | |||||||||||||
2. Quantitative randomized | ||||||||||||||||||||
Clear description of the randomization? | N/A | N/A | N | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | |||||||||||||
Clear description of allocation or concealment? | N/A | N/A | N | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | |||||||||||||
Complete outcome data? | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | Y | |||||||||||||
Low withdrawal/drop-out? | N/A | N/A | Y | N/A | N/A | N/A | N | |||||||||||||
3. Quantitative non-randomized | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment minimizes selection bias? | Y | Y | N/A | Y | N | Y | N/A | |||||||||||||
Measurements appropriate? | Y | Y | N/A | Y | Y | Y | N/A | |||||||||||||
Comparable groups or control for differences? | N | N | N/A | N | N | N | N/A | |||||||||||||
Complete outcome data, acceptable response rate, or acceptable follow-up rate? | Y | N | N/A | N | Y | Y | N/A | |||||||||||||
4. Mixed methods | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research design relevant? | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | |||||||||||||
Integration of qualitative and quantitative data relevant? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |||||||||||||
Appropriate consideration given to limitations associated with integration? | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | |||||||||||||
Total score (%) | 75 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 75 | 75 | |||||||||||||