Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds ratio of process and patient composite scores

From: Computerized clinical decision support system for diabetes in primary care does not improve quality of care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial

 

Control

Intervention

Odds ratio

IG vs CG

Change process score at 6M, number of (%)

 Worsening 6M

445/1314 (33.87%)

309/855 (36.14%)

 

 No change 6M

320/1314 (24.35%)

206/855 (24.09%)

 

 Improvement 6M

549/1314 (41.78%)

340/855 (39.77%)

 

Change process score at 12M, number of (%)

 Worsening 12M

610/1477 (41.30%)

377/1003 (37.59%)

 

 No change 12M

224/1477 (15.17%)

166/1003 (16.55%)

 

 Improvement 12M

643/1477 (43.53%)

460/1003 (45.86%)

 

Probability improvement/no worsening process score 6M (95% CI)

 Improvement 6M

0.45 (0.38; 0.52)

0.43 (0.35; 0.51)

 

 No worsening 6M

0.64 (0.58; 0.71)

0.63 (0.55; 0.69)

0.92 (0.61; 1.39)

Probability improvement/no worsening process score 12M (95% CI)

 Improvement 12M

0.41 (0.34; 0.48)

0.43 (0.36; 0.51)

 

 No worsening 12M

0.61 (0.54; 0.67)

0.63 (0.55; 0.69)

1.09 (0.73; 1.63)

Change patient score at 6M, number of (%)

 Worsening 6M

49/475 (10.32%)

24/196 (12.24%)

 

 No change 6M

352/475 (74.11%)

147/196 (75.00%)

 

 Improvement 6M

74/475 (15.58%)

25/196 (12.76%)

 

Change patient score at 12M, number of (%)

 Worsening 12M

60/407 (14.74%)

30/176 (17.05%)

 

 No change 12M

246/407 (60.44%)

112/176 (63.64%)

 

 Improvement 12M

101/407 (24.82%)

34/176 (19.32%)

 

Probability improvement/no worsening patient score 6M (95% CI)

 Improvement 6M

0.20 (0.16; 0.25)

0.18 (0.13; 0.24)

 

 No worsening 6M

0.88 (0.85; 0.91)

0.87 (0.81; 0.91)

0.87 (0.59; 1.29)

Probability improvement/no worsening patient score 12M (95% CI)

 Improvement 12M

0.24 (0.19; 0.29)

0.19 (0.13; 0.25)

 

 No worsening 12M

0.90 (0.87; 0.93)

0.87 (0.82; 0.91)

0.74 (0.49; 1.12)