Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds ratio of process and patient composite scores

From: Computerized clinical decision support system for diabetes in primary care does not improve quality of care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial

 ControlInterventionOdds ratio
IG vs CG
Change process score at 6M, number of (%)
 Worsening 6M445/1314 (33.87%)309/855 (36.14%) 
 No change 6M320/1314 (24.35%)206/855 (24.09%) 
 Improvement 6M549/1314 (41.78%)340/855 (39.77%) 
Change process score at 12M, number of (%)
 Worsening 12M610/1477 (41.30%)377/1003 (37.59%) 
 No change 12M224/1477 (15.17%)166/1003 (16.55%) 
 Improvement 12M643/1477 (43.53%)460/1003 (45.86%) 
Probability improvement/no worsening process score 6M (95% CI)
 Improvement 6M0.45 (0.38; 0.52)0.43 (0.35; 0.51) 
 No worsening 6M0.64 (0.58; 0.71)0.63 (0.55; 0.69)0.92 (0.61; 1.39)
Probability improvement/no worsening process score 12M (95% CI)
 Improvement 12M0.41 (0.34; 0.48)0.43 (0.36; 0.51) 
 No worsening 12M0.61 (0.54; 0.67)0.63 (0.55; 0.69)1.09 (0.73; 1.63)
Change patient score at 6M, number of (%)
 Worsening 6M49/475 (10.32%)24/196 (12.24%) 
 No change 6M352/475 (74.11%)147/196 (75.00%) 
 Improvement 6M74/475 (15.58%)25/196 (12.76%) 
Change patient score at 12M, number of (%)
 Worsening 12M60/407 (14.74%)30/176 (17.05%) 
 No change 12M246/407 (60.44%)112/176 (63.64%) 
 Improvement 12M101/407 (24.82%)34/176 (19.32%) 
Probability improvement/no worsening patient score 6M (95% CI)
 Improvement 6M0.20 (0.16; 0.25)0.18 (0.13; 0.24) 
 No worsening 6M0.88 (0.85; 0.91)0.87 (0.81; 0.91)0.87 (0.59; 1.29)
Probability improvement/no worsening patient score 12M (95% CI)
 Improvement 12M0.24 (0.19; 0.29)0.19 (0.13; 0.25) 
 No worsening 12M0.90 (0.87; 0.93)0.87 (0.82; 0.91)0.74 (0.49; 1.12)