Skip to main content

Table 2 Theory analysis elements applied to sustainability frameworks/models/theories

From: Identifying relevant concepts and factors for the sustainability of evidence-based practices within acute care contexts: a systematic review and theory analysis of selected sustainability frameworks

Categories

Criteria

Origins

Who are the developers, discipline, country?

Methodological approach

Evidence to support or refute model development

Target domain (practice, education, research, policy)

Motivation(s) for development

Meaning of the framework/model/theory (F/M/T)

Examines conceptual definitions and their use

Identifies concepts (factors),

Inclusiveness of innovation, potential adopters, context factors

Relationship between and among concepts (factors)

Assumptions underlying the model (preconditions)

Schematic presentation

Empirical testability

Supported by empirical data (studies)

Parsimonious

Language

Clarity and simplicity while being complete (as per rater)

Use of clear, concise language (as per rater)

Logical adequacy

Logical adequacy (logical structure of the concepts and statements)

Predictions or testable hypotheses are provided

Logical fallacies within the content or structure of the model

Usefulness

Supported by tools

Practicality to nursing and or other target groups.

Contributes to the understanding and predicting of outcomes

Generalizability

Clinical context, generalizes (can be extended) to multiple settings

  1. Based on Walker and Avant [36]