Can a multicomponent multidisciplinary implementation package change physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions and practices regarding thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke? An exploratory analysis of a cluster-randomized trial

Table 5 Effect of intervention on domain 3 score = personal stroke skills and hospital stroke care policies

	Intervention group		Control group		Intervention vs. control group^a,b; p value
	Pre-intervention (Mean ± SD)	Post-intervention (Mean ± SD)	Pre-intervention (Mean ± SD)	Post-intervention (Mean ± SD)
Overall
	3.48 ± 0.45	3.60 ± 0.39	3.48 ± 0.47	3.55 ± 0.43	0.04 (− 0.10; 0.18); 0.597
Location
Metropolitan	3.52 ± 0.45	3.65 ± 0.36	3.48 ± 0.47	3.59 ± 0.39	0.01 (− 0.10; 0.13); 0.828
Non-metropolitan	3.44 ± 0.45	3.52 ± 0.43	3.46 ± 0.47	3.46 ± 0.51	0.09 (−v0.14; 0.22); 0.601
Job role
Physician	3.49 ± 0.43	3.63 ± 0.40	3.48 ± 0.48	3.57 ± 0.40	0.04 (− 0.14; 0.22); 0.696
Nurse	3.49 ± 0.45	3.59 ± 0.39	3.48 ± 0.47	3.54 ± 0.46	0.04 (− 0.13; 0.21); 0.670

*p value < 0.05 considered as significant
**p value < 0.01 considered as significant
***p value < 0.001 considered as significant
^aChange from pre-intervention to post-intervention survey
^bLinear mixed model controlled for category based on baseline thrombolysis rate

ISSN: 1748-5908