Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted models predicting EBP intensity from individual and organizational factors

From: Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools: a cross-sectional observational study

Regressions adjusted for covariates

Variable

DTT intensity

PRT intensity

VS intensity

 

β

R 2

β

R 2

β

R 2

Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS)

−.21

.07

−.23

.05

−.23

.13

 Teacher Education

.14

 

–

–

.00

 

 Teacher Age

–

 

–

–

.25

 

Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)

−.15

.05

−.04

.00

−.18

.12

 Teacher Education

.15

 

–

–

.01

 

 Teacher Age

–

 

–

–

.24

 

EBPAS

      

 Requirements

.24

.09

−.04

.00

−.04

.06

 Teacher Education

.22

 

–

–

−.02

 

 Teacher Age

–

 

–

–

.20

 

 Appeal

.41**

.18

.20

.04

.11

.08

 Teacher Education

.28

 

–

–

.00

 

 Teacher Age

–

 

–

–

.20

 

 Openness

.09

.04

.07

.01

.22

.11

 Teacher Education

.17

 

–

–

−.01

 

 Teacher Age

–

 

–

–

.22

 

 Divergence

−.34**

.15

−.16

.15

−.23

.10

 Teacher Education

.23

 

–

–

.01

 

 Teacher Age

–

 

–

–

.21

 
  1. **p < .01; *p < .05; DTT Discrete Trial Training, PRT Pivotal Response Training, VS Visual Schedules, EBPAS Evidence-based Practice Attitudes Scale