Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted models predicting EBP intensity from individual and organizational factors

From: Individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of evidence-based practices for children with autism in public schools: a cross-sectional observational study

Regressions adjusted for covariates
Variable DTT intensity PRT intensity VS intensity
  β R 2 β R 2 β R 2
Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) −.21 .07 −.23 .05 −.23 .13
 Teacher Education .14   .00  
 Teacher Age   .25  
Implementation Climate Scale (ICS) −.15 .05 −.04 .00 −.18 .12
 Teacher Education .15   .01  
 Teacher Age   .24  
EBPAS       
 Requirements .24 .09 −.04 .00 −.04 .06
 Teacher Education .22   −.02  
 Teacher Age   .20  
 Appeal .41** .18 .20 .04 .11 .08
 Teacher Education .28   .00  
 Teacher Age   .20  
 Openness .09 .04 .07 .01 .22 .11
 Teacher Education .17   −.01  
 Teacher Age   .22  
 Divergence −.34** .15 −.16 .15 −.23 .10
 Teacher Education .23   .01  
 Teacher Age   .21  
  1. **p < .01; *p < .05; DTT Discrete Trial Training, PRT Pivotal Response Training, VS Visual Schedules, EBPAS Evidence-based Practice Attitudes Scale