Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 May 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jon Banks|
|7 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Linda Sundberg|
|17 Dec 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Randall Gale|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Dec 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|1 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.