Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 May 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jon Banks
7 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Linda Sundberg
17 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Randall Gale
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
1 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.