Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristicsa

From: Middle managers’ role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review

Characteristic

N (%)

Study objective

 Assess implementation determinants

51 (48.6)

 Assess middle managers’ role

13 (12.4)

 Assess perceptions of EBP

9 (8.6)

 Assess implementation outcomes

9 (8.6)

 Assess EBP effectiveness

5 (4.8)

 Other

18 (17.1)

Setting

 Hospital/inpatient

39 (37.1)

 Outpatient

24 (22.9)

 Long-term care facility

9 (8.6)

 Multiple

19 (18.1)

 Other

14 (13.3)

Country

 USA

38 (36.2)

 UK

18 (17.1)

 Canada

12 (11.4)

 Australia

11 (10.5)

 Other

26 (24.8)

EBP

 Regulations, policies, and guidelines

23 (21.9)

 Technological innovation (e.g., surgical instrument, MRI)

10 (9.5)

 Administrative innovations

16 (15.2)

 Operational innovation (e.g., QI initiative to improve lab ordering)

11 (10.5)

 Human resources development (e.g., training staff)

10 (9.5)

 Multiple (i.e., the study included multiple EBPs)

15 (14.3)

 Other

20 (19)

Phase of implementation in which middle managers’ role assessed

 During implementation

32 (30.5)

 Post-implementation

19 (18.1)

 Pre-implementation

3 (2.9)

 Multiple phases

33 (31.4)

 Unable to determine

18 (17.1)

Design

 Observational

92 (87.6)

 Quasi-experimental

9 (8.6)

 Experimental

4 (3.8)

Method

 Qualitative

56 (53.3)

 Mixed

41 (39.1)

 Quantitative

8 (7.6)

Data collection

 Middle manager as source

  Yes

90 (85.7)

  No

9 (8.6)

  Unable to determine

6 (5.7)

 Unit of data collection

  Individual

76 (72.4)

  Organizational

5 (4.8)

  Both

24 (22.9)

 Source

 

  Focus groups

1 (1.0)

  Observation

2 (1.9)

  Survey

4 (3.8)

  Interview

32 (30.5)

  Multiple

54 (51.4)

  Questionnaire

8 (7.6)

  Secondary data analysis

4 (3.8)

 Questionnaire usedb

  No

65 (61.9)

  Yes

39 (37.1)

  Unable to determine

1 (0.9)

 Questionnaire validated (n = 39)

 

  No

16 (40)

  Yes

10 (25)

  Unable to determine

13 (35)

Unit of analysis

 Individual

40 (38.1)

 Organizational

38 (36.2)

 Both

27 (25.7)

  1. EBP evidence-based practice, QI quality improvement
  2. aN = 105 except where otherwise specified
  3. bEight articles used only questionnaires; 31 of the articles used questionnaires as well as other data sources