Skip to main content

Table 5 Overview of descriptive pilot study results (N = 144)

From: The Swedish version of the Normalization Process Theory Measure S-NoMAD: translation, adaptation, and pilot testing

English answers alternatives

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Not relevant to my role

Not relevant at this stage

Not relevant to the intervention

Missing data

Swedish answers alternatives

Instämmer fullständigt

Instämmer

Varken in-stämmer eller motsäger

Håller inte med

Håller verkligen inte med

Ej relevant för min roll

Ej relevant i detta skede

Ej relevant för inter-ventionen

Uppgift saknas

Item

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

I can see how the [intervention] differs from usual ways of working

17 (11.8%)

99 (68.8%)

23 (16%)

1 (0.7%)

1 (0.7%)

2 (1.4%)

1 (0.7%)

0

0

Staff in this organisation have a shared understanding of the purpose of this [intervention]

6 (4.2%)

42 (29.2%)

65 (45.1%)

17 (11.8%)

5 (3.5%)

5 (3.5%)

4 (2.8%)

0

0

I understand how the [intervention] affects the nature of my own work

13 (9.0%)

59 (41%)

51 (35.4%)

10 (6.9%)

5 (3.5%)

4 (2.8%)

1 (0.7%)

0

1 (0.7%)

I can see the potential value of the [intervention] for my work

14 (9.7%)

67 (46.5%)

43 (29.9%)

11(7.6%)

3 (2.1%)

4 (2.8%)

2 (1.4%)

0

0

There are key people who drive the [intervention] forward and get others involved

22 (15.3%)

82 (56.9%)

31 (21.5%)

4 (2.8%)

0

2 (1.4%)

1 (0.7%)

1 (0.7%)

1 (0.7%)

I believe that participating in the [intervention] is a legitimate part of my role

27 (18.8%)

89 (61.8%)

23 (16%)

1 (0.7%)

0

2 (1.4%)

1 (0.7%)

0

1 (0.7%)

I am open to working with colleagues in new ways to use the [intervention]

44 (30.6%)

89 (61.8%)

8 (5.6%)

0

0

2 (1.4%)

0

0

1 (0.7%)

I will continue to support the [intervention]

40 (27.8%)

87 (60.4%)

14 (9.7%)

0

0

0

1 (0.7%)

0

2 (1.4%)

I can easily integrate the [intervention] into my existing work

9 (6.3%)

38 (26.4%)

64 (44.4%)

20 (13.9)%

8 (5.6%)

3 (2.1%)

1 (0.7%)

0

1 (0.7%)

The [intervention] disrupts working relationships

21 (14.6%)

77 (53.5%)

43 (29.9%)

1 (0 7%)

1 (0.7%)

0

0

0

1 (0.7%)

I have confidence in other people’s ability to use the [intervention]

16 (11.1%)

80 (55.6%)

43 (29.9%)

3 (2.1%)

0

 

1 (0.7%)

 

1 (0.7%)

Work is assigned to those with skills appropriate to the [intervention]

12 (8.3%)

67 (46.5%)

54 (37.5%)

9 (6 3%)

0

0

0

0

2 (1.4%)

Sufficient training is provided to enable staff to use the [intervention]

10 (6.9%)

39 (27.1%)

53 (36 8%)

23 (16.0%)

15 (10.4%)

1 (0.7%)

1 (0.7%)

0

2 (1.4%)

Sufficient resources are available to support the [intervention]

9 (6.3%)

33 (22.9%)

64 (44.4%)

21 (14.6%)

15 (10.4%)

0

0

0

2 (1.4%)

Management adequately supports the [intervention]

16 (11.1%)

54 (37.5%)

61 (42.4%)

6 (4.2%)

2 (1.4%)

1 (0.7%)

1 (0.7%)

1 (0.7%)

2 (1.4%)

I am aware of reports about the effects of the [intervention]

6 (4.2%)

46 (31.9%)

60 (41.7%)

19 (13.2%)

4 (2.8%)

2 (1.4%)

2 (1.4%)

0

5 (3.5%)

The staff agree that the [intervention] is worthwhile

10 (6.9%)

43 (29.9%)

70 (48.6%)

10 (6.9%)

1 (0.7%)

2 (1.4%)

4 (2.8%)

0

4 (2.8%)

I value the effects the [intervention] has had on my work

16 (11.1%)

63 (43.8%)

53 (36.8%)

6 (4.2%)

0

1 (0.7%)

1 (0.7%)

0

4 (2.8%)

Feedback about the [intervention] can be used to improve it in the future

44 (30.6)%

79 (54.9%)

16 (11.1%)

0

0

0

1 (0.7%)

0

4 (2.8%)

I can modify how I work with the [intervention]

15 (10.4%)

60 (41.7%)

55 (38.2%)

6 (4 2%)

1 (0.7%)

1 (0.7%)

2 (1.4%)

0

4 (2.8%)