Skip to main content

Table 2 New York State Collaborative Care Medicaid Program Reporting Metrics (2015–2017): year 1 and year 2 sustainability (vs. baseline) in 26 clinics opting to sustain CC after a 2-year implementation initiative (We used quarter 3 data for each year to ensure comparable results (e.g., some metrics reported for calendar year and others for a given quarter))

From: Sustainability of collaborative care management for depression in primary care settings with academic affiliations across New York State

Metric (median, [IQR])

Implementation end (2014)†

Baseline sustainability (2015)†

P value (2015 vs. 2014)

Year 1 sustainability (2016)

P value (2016 vs. 2015)

Year 2 sustainability (2017)

P value (2017 vs. 2015)

% screened

96.5% [13.0]

88.5% [19.0]

< 0.001

86.0% [31.0]

0.38

91.0% [18.0]

0.01 ††

Depression care manager full-time equivalent

1.00 [0.75]

1.00 [1.00]]

0.08

1.00 [1.00]

0.79

2.00 [1.00]

0.09††

Number of participants enrolled/FTE

 

56.0 [36.0]

N/A

44.6 [18.0]

0.23

36.5 [37.5]

0.004

Number of participants screening positive for depression/FTE

 

297 [354]

N/A

281 [204]

0.17

337 [294]

0.81

Median Patient Health Questionnaire of current enrollees

 

10.5 [5.0]

N/A

9.75 [6.0]

0.41

10.0 [3.0]

0.23

% enrolled with ≥ 3 contacts

 

29.0% [33.0]

N/A

24.0% [33.0]

0.17

40.5% [24.0]

0.03

% enrolled 70 days with improvement (PHQ < 10 or 50% reduction)

 

33.0% [22.0]

N/A

49.0% [25.0]

0.009

58.0% [19.0]

0.004

% not improved after 70 days with psychiatry consult

 

55.0% [47.0]

N/A

57.5% [29.0]

1.00

80.5% [49.0]

0.11

% not improved after 70 days with treatment change

 

48.0 [36.0]

N/A

54.0% [39.0]

1.00

73.0% [53.0]

0.33

  1. †Only 3 comparable metrics were available for implementation and the sustainability initiatives. It is unclear whether clinics were reporting enrollment rates similarly between implementation and sustainability phases (calendar year vs. per quarter)
  2. ††Compared to implementation phase, year 2 sustainability saw significantly higher DCM FTE (p = 0.004) and lower screening rates (p = 0.03)
  3. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant