Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of community pharmacies participating in NC-CPESN

From: Testing the organizational theory of innovation implementation effectiveness in a community pharmacy medication management program: a hurdle regression analysis

Characteristics

Implementers (n = 113)

Mean (SD) or %

Non-implementers (n = 78)

Mean (SD) or %

Total (n = 191)

Mean (SD) or %

Range

Key independent variables

 Implementation climate

11.81 (3.0252)

3.55 (3.064)***

8.37 (5.087)

0–16

 Innovation-values fit

13.55 (2.0218)

11.06 (3.99)***

12.51 (3.231)

0–16

Patient needs and resources

 Rural location

57.78

42.22

23.56

0–1

 Clinical factors

31.94 (29.78)

39.63 (29.40)

35.08 (29.8)

1–100

 Social factors

44.07 (30.8)

46.36 (33.17)

45.01 (31.8)

1–100

 340B participation

69.12

30.88*

36.76

0–1

 Proportion of high-risk patients

0.42 (0.14)

0.36 (0.18)**

0.40 (0.16)

0–0.87

Available resources

 Presence of a clinical pharmacist

86.49

13.51***

19.37

0–1

 Total number of staff

12.83 (6.464)

11.53 (8.827)

12.30 (7.525)

1–40

 Presence of pharmacy student or resident

92.86

7.14***

21.99

0–1

Access to knowledge about the intervention

 Amount of experience with NC-CPESN (months)

34.37 (7.0546)

27.05 (7.96)***

31.38 (8.249)

12.1–44.7

 Past performance with NC-CPESN

0.03 (0.04)

0.00 (0.00)**

0.02 (0.0)

0–0.31

 Participation in Medicare Part D MTM

67.27

32.73***

86.39

0–1

Structural characteristics

 Independent pharmacy

57.83

42.17

43.46

0–1

 Low prescription volume

56.06

43.94

34.55

0–1

 Established pharmacy

45.13

30.77

39.27

0–1

  1. Significance of t tests or Pearson’s chi-square tests comparing implementers to non-implementers: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001