Themes | Times cited | Reliability of findings |
---|---|---|
Organisational culture | 40 | Â |
 EBI matches well with mission of TSO | 9 | High reliability |
 Organisational support/prioritisation for EBI | 6 | High reliability |
 Champions | 4 | High reliability |
 Supportive leadership | 5 | Medium reliability |
 Inclusive organisational team/culture | 4 | Medium reliability |
 Staff motivation to deliver EBI | 3 | Medium reliability |
 Organisational capacity | 3 | Medium reliability |
 Strategic planning | 2 | Medium reliability |
 Organisational stability | 1 | Medium reliability |
 Internal flexibility of resources | 1 | Low reliability |
 Involving staff and volunteers | 1 | Low reliability |
 Strength of planning committee | 1 | Low reliability |
Delivery capability | 18 | Â |
 Staff expertise | 4 | High reliability |
 Receiving intervention training | 4 | High reliability |
 Staff experience with delivering EBI | 4 | Medium reliability |
 Administrative infrastructure and capacity | 4 | Medium reliability |
 Continuous training | 1 | Low reliability |
 Clear staff roles in implementing the EBI | 1 | Low reliability |
Accountability | 15 | Â |
 Perceived effectiveness of EBI | 8 | High reliability |
 Continuous evaluation of EBI | 3 | High reliability |
 Novelty of EF | 1 | Medium reliability |
 Relative advantage of EBI | 1 | Low reliability |
 Cost effective | 1 | Low reliability |
 Using EBI will improve professional practice | 1 | Low reliability |
Adaptation | 13 | Â |
 Flexibility regarding the implementation of interventions | 9 | High reliability |
 Match with the target population | 4 | High reliability |
Collaboration/external factors | 10 | Â |
 Invitation to partner with another organisation to offer EF | 1 | Medium reliability |
 Working with partner with experience delivering the EBI | 2 | Low reliability |
 Working with experienced partners | 2 | Low reliability |
 Working with partners with consistent access to target population | 1 | Low reliability |
 Partnerships (unspecified) | 1 | Low reliability |
 Political support | 1 | Low reliability |
 Coordination and communication with other agencies | 1 | Low reliability |
 External support | 1 | Low reliability |
Clients/community factors | 9 | Â |
 Use of incentives | 2 | Medium reliability |
 Access to target population through existing programmes | 2 | Low reliability |
 Experience working with population | 2 | Low reliability |
 Ability to recruit and retain IDU clients | 2 | Low reliability |
 Client participation in goal setting and feedback. | 1 | Low reliability |
Funders | 7 | Â |
 Access and availability of training | 2 | Medium reliability |
 Continuous support in delivering the EBI. | 2 | Medium reliability |
 Using EBI that is recognised by funder | 1 | Medium reliability |
 Funding stability | 1 | Low reliability |
 Flexibility of prioritisation of resources | 1 | Low reliability |
Other | 7 | Â |
 Logistics | 1 | Low reliability |
 Established national organisation | 1 | Low reliability |
 Communication | 1 | Low reliability |
 HIV testing success | 1 | Low reliability |
 No. of clinicians certified/employed at grant end | 1 | Low reliability |
 No. of supervisors certified/employed at grant end | 1 | Low reliability |
 No. of youth served during grant period | 1 | Low reliability |
Resources | 4 | Â |
 Availability of technical assistance | 2 | Medium reliability |
 Financial support | 1 | Medium reliability |
 Supplying needed resources | 1 | Low reliability |
Intervention specific factors | 3 | Â |
 Easy to use | 1 | Low reliability |
 Availability of manuals | 1 | Low reliability |
 Implementation is rewarding | 1 | Low reliability |
Key for reliability ratings* | ||
 High reliability | The identified factor is consistently supported by several studies of medium quality and from one high-quality study, or the study is supported by at least two high-quality studies. | |
 Medium reliability | The identified factor is supported from several medium-quality studies, or the factor is identified from at least one high-quality study. | |
 Low reliability | The identified factor is supported by several studies of low quality and/or single studies of medium quality. |