The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jan 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Liz Glidewell|
|22 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wynne Norton|
|6 Apr 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Stijn Van de Velde|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Apr 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Apr 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Liz Glidewell|
|2 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wynne Norton|
|23 May 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Stijn Van de Velde|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 May 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 May 2018||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jun 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13012-018-0772-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.