Skip to main content

Table 2 Actual performance and recommendations (upper rows) and perceived clinical performance and intentions to improve practice (lower rows)

From: Health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units

 

All quality indicators (n = 288)

Measuring pain (n = 72)

Acceptable pain scores (n = 72)

Repeating pain measurements (n = 72)

Normalised pain scores (n = 72)

Actual performance and recommendations

 Performance, median (IQR)

41.4 (11.4–82.6)

66.2 (55.7–83.8)

84.9 (82.4–89.6)

12.9 (4.6–22.2)

9.3 (4.1–21.1)

 Top 10% peer performance, median (IQR)

74.5 (38–92.4)

91.2 (89.6–95.2)

92.5 (90.8–94)

38 (38–52.5)

31.7 (30.8–42.3)

 Improvement recommendation

  Good performance, n (%)

71 (24.7%)

15 (20.8%)

40 (55.6%)

8 (11.1%)

8 (11.1%)

  Room for improvement, n (%)

112 (38.9%)

28 (38.9%)

30 (41.7%)

26 (36.1%)

28 (38.9%)

  Improvement recommended, n (%)

105 (36.5%)

29 (40.3%)

2 (2.8%)

38 (52.8%)

36 (50%)

Perceived performance and improvement intentions

 Perceived performance, median (IQR)

70 (50–85)

86.5 (70–95.8)

75 (60–80)

60 (40–80)

60 (40–80)

 Perceived peer performance, median (IQR)

70 (60–80)

80 (70–85)

75 (60–80)

60 (50–80)

62.5 (50–80)

 Target [before feedback], median (IQR)

90 (80–95)

90 (88.8–95)

87.5 (80–95)

90 (80–100)

80 (75–90)

 Target [after feedback], median (IQR)

90 (75–90)

90 (90–95)

90 (85–90.6)

80 (60–90)

70 (50–90)

 Intention to improve [before feedback], n (%)

230 (79.9%)

49 (68.1%)

58 (80.6%)

62 (86.1%)

61 (84.7%)

 Intention to improve [after feedback], n (%)

239 (83%)

58 (80.6%)

43 (59.7%)

69 (95.8%)

69 (95.8%)