Health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Dec 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Cameron Long|
|19 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Meire Cavalieri Almeida|
|20 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernadette Brown|
|29 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Wouter T. Gude|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Meire Cavalieri Almeida|
|30 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernadette Brown|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13012-018-0727-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.