Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Dynamics behind the scale up of evidence-based obesity prevention: protocol for a multi-site case study of an electronic implementation monitoring system in health promotion practice

  • Kathleen P. Conte1,
  • Sisse Groen1,
  • Victoria Loblay1,
  • Amanda Green2,
  • Andrew Milat3,
  • Lina Persson3,
  • Christine Innes-Hughes2,
  • Jo Mitchell4,
  • Sarah Thackway3,
  • Mandy Williams5 and
  • Penelope Hawe1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
Implementation Science201712:146

Received: 31 October 2017

Accepted: 27 November 2017

Published: 6 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
31 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kathleen Conte
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0686-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health & The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
NSW Office of Preventive Health, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool BC, Australia
Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, New South Wales Ministry of Health, North Sydney, Australia
Centre for Population Health, New South Wales Ministry of Health, North Sydney, Australia
South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool BC, Australia