Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence use in decision-making on introducing innovations: a systematic scoping review with stakeholder feedback

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anders Bach-Mortensen
21 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Armstrong
21 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristel Alla
25 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Simon Turner
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anders Bach-Mortensen
22 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristel Alla
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
8 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0669-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement