This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evidence use in decision-making on introducing innovations: a systematic scoping review with stakeholder feedback
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 May 2017
Accepted: 8 November 2017
Published: 4 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anders Bach-Mortensen|
|21 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Armstrong|
|21 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristel Alla|
|25 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Simon Turner|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anders Bach-Mortensen|
|22 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristel Alla|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0669-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.