This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Number and type of guideline implementation tools varies by guideline, clinical condition, country of origin, and type of developer organization: content analysis of guidelines
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 4 September 2017
Accepted: 7 November 2017
Published: 15 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Sep 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Brouwers|
|8 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jako Burgers|
|11 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Laurel Liang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0668-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.