Skip to content

Advertisement

Implementation Science

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Number and type of guideline implementation tools varies by guideline, clinical condition, country of origin, and type of developer organization: content analysis of guidelines

  • Laurel Liang1,
  • Jhoni Abi Safi2,
  • Anna R. Gagliardi1Email author and
  • members of the Guidelines International Network Implementation Working Group
Implementation Science201712:136

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0668-7

Received: 4 September 2017

Accepted: 7 November 2017

Published: 15 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Sep 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Brouwers
8 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jako Burgers
11 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Laurel Liang
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
7 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0668-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Toronto General Hospital Research Institute
(2)
Envisol

Advertisement