Skip to main content

Table 6 Criteria ranking (n = 175)

From: Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey

Criterion

First most important (%)

Second most important (%)

Third most important (%)

Total (%)

Empirical support

16.57

11.43

5.14

33.14

Application to a specific setting/population

13.71

8.00

4.57

26.29

Explanatory power/testability

12.57

5.71

6.29

24.57

Description of a change process

10.86

9.14

4.57

24.57

Analytic level

8.00

11.43

7.43

26.86

Specificity of a causal relationship among constructs

6.86

5.71

6.29

18.86

Logical consistency/plausibility

6.29

5.71

5.71

17.71

Generalizability

5.14

5.14

9.71

20.00

Process guidance

5.14

7.43

10.86

23.43

Outcome of interest

4.00

3.43

4.57

12.00

Other criteria

4.00

3.43

4.00

11.43

Disciplinary approval

2.86

4.57

3.43

10.86

Associated research method

1.14

6.29

6.29

13.71

Simplicity/parsimony

1.14

4.00

5.14

10.29

Disciplinary origins

0.57

1.14

2.29

4.00

Falsifiability

0.57

2.86

1.14

4.57

Inclusion of change strategies/techniques

0.57

2.86

4.00

7.43

Fecundity

0.00

1.71

0.57

2.29

Inclusion of a diagrammatic representation

0.00

0.00

4.57

4.57

Uniqueness

0.00

0.00

1.71

1.71

None of the above

n/a

n/a

1.71

1.71

  1. n/a not available