Skip to content

Advertisement

Implementation Science

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Studying de-implementation in health: an analysis of funded research grants

  • Wynne E. Norton1Email author,
  • Amy E. Kennedy2 and
  • David A. Chambers1
Contributed equally
Implementation Science201712:144

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0655-z

Received: 7 June 2017

Accepted: 18 October 2017

Published: 4 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross Brownson
16 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rinad Beidas
21 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Wynne Norton
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Wynne Norton
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
18 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0655-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
(2)
Center for Research Strategy, Office of the Director, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

Advertisement