This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Studying de-implementation in health: an analysis of funded research grants
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 June 2017
Accepted: 18 October 2017
Published: 4 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ross Brownson|
|16 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rinad Beidas|
|21 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Wynne Norton|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Wynne Norton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0655-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.