This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Updated clinical guidelines experience major reporting limitations
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 2 June 2017
Accepted: 3 October 2017
Published: 12 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi|
|16 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Vandyke|
|19 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Long|
|8 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Robin W.M. Vernooij|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Robin W.M. Vernooij|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|12 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0651-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.