This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Toward criteria for pragmatic measurement in implementation research and practice: a stakeholder-driven approach using concept mapping
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 May 2017
Accepted: 25 September 2017
Published: 3 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elena Atkinson|
|23 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicole Rankin|
|24 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Rapley|
|29 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Byron Powell|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Byron Powell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|3 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0649-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.