Skip to content

Advertisement

Implementation Science

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Improving the production of applied health research findings: insights from a qualitative study of operational research

Implementation Science201712:112

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0643-3

Received: 4 July 2017

Accepted: 4 September 2017

Published: 8 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marion Penn
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Monks
22 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sonya Crowe
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
4 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0643-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London
(2)
Department of Applied Health Research, University College London

Advertisement