This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Facilitated interprofessional implementation of a physical rehabilitation guideline for stroke in inpatient settings: process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial
- Nancy M. Salbach1, 11Email author,
- Sharon Wood-Dauphinee2,
- Johanne Desrosiers3,
- Janice J. Eng4,
- Ian D. Graham5,
- Susan B. Jaglal1,
- Nicol Korner-Bitensky2,
- Marilyn MacKay-Lyons6,
- Nancy E. Mayo7,
- Carol L. Richards8,
- Robert W. Teasell9,
- Merrick Zwarenstein10,
- Mark T. Bayley11 and
- on behalf of the Stroke Canada Optimization of Rehabilitation By Evidence – Implementation Trial (SCORE-IT) Team
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 31 October 2016
Accepted: 24 July 2017
Published: 1 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Euan Sadler|
|1 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nancy Salbach|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Euan Sadler|
|19 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nancy Salbach|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|1 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0631-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.