Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Teasing apart “the tangled web” of influence of policy dialogues: lessons from a case study of dialogues about healthcare reform options for Canada

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melanie Barwick
23 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bev Holmes
17 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gillian Mulvale
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bev Holmes
16 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gillian Mulvale
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bev Holmes
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0627-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement