Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How do stakeholders from multiple hierarchical levels of a large provincial health system define engagement? A qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Brooks
9 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dorie Apollonio
14 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jill Norris
Resubmission - Version 2
14 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jill Norris
Resubmission - Version 3
23 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Valerie Albert
7 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jill Norris
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jill Norris
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement