Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

General practitioners’ views and preferences about quality improvement feedback in preventive care: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland and France

Implementation Science201712:95

Received: 18 February 2017

Accepted: 10 July 2017

Published: 26 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wouter Gude
10 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sylvia Hysong
24 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Paul Sebo
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0623-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Primary Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine and Department of Paediatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland