Skip to content

Advertisement

Implementation Science

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

General practitioners’ views and preferences about quality improvement feedback in preventive care: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland and France

Implementation Science201712:95

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0623-7

Received: 18 February 2017

Accepted: 10 July 2017

Published: 26 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wouter Gude
10 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sylvia Hysong
24 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Paul Sebo
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
10 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0623-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Primary Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva
(2)
Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes
(3)
Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne
(4)
Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine and Department of Paediatrics, Geneva University Hospitals

Advertisement