Skip to content

Advertisement

Implementation Science

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants

Implementation Science201712:101

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4

Received: 23 March 2017

Accepted: 29 June 2017

Published: 2 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross Brownson
22 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amanda Buttery
1 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Baumann
22 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Siw Carlfjord
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
29 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine, Linköping University
(2)
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Analysis, Linköping University

Advertisement