Skip to content

Advertisement

Implementation Science

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effects of the EQUIP quasi-experimental study testing a collaborative quality improvement approach for maternal and newborn health care in Tanzania and Uganda

Contributed equally
Implementation Science201712:89

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0604-x

Received: 23 March 2016

Accepted: 30 May 2017

Published: 18 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kenneth Sherr
29 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chi
15 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Peter Waiswa
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kenneth Sherr
26 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chi
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Peter Waiswa
Resubmission - Version 4
17 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
30 May 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0604-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University
(2)
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet
(3)
Ifakara Health Institute
(4)
Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(5)
Evaplan GmbH the University of Heidelberg
(6)
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management, Ethics, Karolinska Institutet
(7)
Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(8)
Department Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(9)
International Maternal and Child Health Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University

Advertisement