This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Effects of the EQUIP quasi-experimental study testing a collaborative quality improvement approach for maternal and newborn health care in Tanzania and Uganda
- P Waiswa†1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- F Manzi†3,
- G Mbaruku3,
- A. K. Rowe4,
- M Marx5,
- G Tomson2, 6,
- T Marchant7,
- B. A. Willey8,
- J Schellenberg7,
- S Peterson†1, 2, 9,
- C Hanson†2, 7 and
- The EQUIP study team
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 23 March 2016
Accepted: 30 May 2017
Published: 18 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Mar 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Sherr|
|29 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chi|
|15 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Waiswa|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Sherr|
|26 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Waiswa|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0604-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.