Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The creation and validation of the Measure of Effective Attributes of Trainers (MEAT)

  • Meredith R. Boyd1Email author,
  • Cara C. Lewis1, 2, 3,
  • Kelli Scott1,
  • Anne Krendl1 and
  • Aaron R. Lyon3
Implementation Science201712:73

Received: 15 October 2016

Accepted: 16 May 2017

Published: 2 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francois Chiocchio
3 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christiaan Vis
4 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Meredith Boyd
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francois Chiocchio
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 May 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0603-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA