Health professionals’ views on the barriers and enablers to evidence-based practice for acute stroke care: a systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stijn Van de Velde|
|23 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anita Menon|
|28 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Chapman|
|15 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Leonard Baatiema|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Leonard Baatiema|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0599-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.