Table 4 Quadrant assessment
Quadrant | Description | Number of strategies in quadrant | Number of endorsements of strategies in quadrant by respondents | Endorsements per strategy | Number of strategies associated with treatment starts in quadrant (% of strategies in quadrant) | Correlation between number strategies used in quadrant and treatment starts r (p) | Correlation between number strategies used in quadrant and number viremic r (p) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | High importance, high feasibility | 31 | 966 | 31 | 10 (32%) | 0.35 (0.002) | 0.38 (<0.001) |
2 | Low importance, high feasibility | 11 | 215 | 20 | 5 (45%) | 0.37 (<0.001) | 0.38 (<0.001) |
3 | Low importance, low feasibility | 22 | 542 | 25 | 9 (41%) | 0.44 (<0.001) | 0.37 (<0.001) |
4 | High importance, low feasibility | 9 | 293 | 33 | 4 (44%) | 0.44 (<0.001) | 0.41 (<0.001) |