Skip to content

Advertisement

Implementation Science

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Teaching implementation science in a new Master of Science Program in Germany: a survey of stakeholder expectations

  • Charlotte Ullrich1Email author,
  • Cornelia Mahler1,
  • Johanna Forstner1,
  • Joachim Szecsenyi1 and
  • Michel Wensing1
Implementation Science201712:55

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0583-y

Received: 20 January 2017

Accepted: 14 April 2017

Published: 27 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Aron
20 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Baumann
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Vandyke
23 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Charlotte Ullrich
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
14 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0583-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg

Advertisement