The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review
- Dylan Kneale†1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Antonio Rojas-García†2,
- Rosalind Raine2 and
- James Thomas1
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 August 2016
Accepted: 28 March 2017
Published: 20 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Lambert|
|26 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Pietroni|
|23 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dylan Kneale|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Lambert|
|16 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dylan Kneale|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.