Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review

Contributed equally
Implementation Science201712:53

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9

Received: 17 August 2016

Accepted: 28 March 2017

Published: 20 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Lambert
26 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Pietroni
23 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Dylan Kneale
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Lambert
16 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Dylan Kneale
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
28 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
20 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre, UCL Institute of Education, University College London
(2)
NIHR CLAHRC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London

Advertisement