Table 2 Reach and implementation outcomes from Project HEAL churches
From: Adoption, reach, and implementation of a cancer education intervention in African American churches
Outcome | Overall (n = 14a) M (SD) | Traditional (n = 8) M (SD) | Technology-based (n = 6) M (SD) | p value | Level of analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reach | |||||
% enrolled/eligible participants per church | 33.31 (22.72) | 43.23 (26.51) | 21.74 (9.87) | .082 | Participant |
Implementation—adherence | |||||
Spacing of WS in days (expected: ≤ 30 days) | 38.00 (30.55) | 42.38 (40.74) | 32.17 (5.60) | – | Church |
Time to complete WS series in days (expected: 60 days) | 75.71 (60.89) | 84.38 (81.21) | 64.17 (11.21) | – | Church |
CHA attendance per church (range = 0–6) | 5.93 (0.27) | 5.88 (0.35) | 6.00 (0.00) | – | CHA |
Workshop scheduling date (range = 3–9) | 5.21 (2.69) | 6.00 (2.78) | 4.17 (2.40) | – | Church |
Implementation—dosage | |||||
# sessions attended (range = 1–3) | 1.83 (0.28) | 1.74 (0.17) | 1.97 (0.34) | .127 | Participant |
% participants per church enrolled at WS 1 (range = 0–100) | 70.84 (14.35) | 66.22 (10.71) | 77.00 (17.19) | .173 | Participant |
Educational booklets received (range = 1–4) | 3.16 (0.88) | 3.10 (0.90) | 3.25 (0.86) | .250 | Participant |
All slides covered (range = 1–3) | 2.86 (0.39) | 2.92 (0.24) | 2.79 (0.54) | – | CHA |
Implementation—quality | |||||
Recommend becoming a CHA (range = 1–4) | 3.83 (0.39) | 3.77 (0.44) | 3.90 (0.32) | – | CHA |
Recommend Project HEAL to men and women in my church (range = 1–4) | 3.96 (0.21) | 3.92 (0.28) | 4.00 (0.00) | – | CHA |
Participant recruitment by CHAs (max = 39) | 19.40 (9.43) | 19.13 (11.13) | 19.80 (6.65) | – | CHA |
Participant engagement (range = 1–4) | 3.70 (0.22) | 3.65 (0.25) | 3.75 (0.19) | – | CHA |
CHA engagement (range = 1–4) | 3.53 (0.35) | 3.50 (0.24) | 3.57 (0.48) | – | CHA |
CHA presentation competence (range = 1–4) | 3.53 (0.35) | 3.47 (0.37) | 3.60 (0.33) | – | CHA |