Skip to main content

Table 3 Adoption and reach of MISSION-Vet by study group

From: Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy

 

Team 1

Team 2

Team 3

All team

GTO

IU

GTO

IU

GTO

IU

GTO

IU

Adoption

 % CM tried MISSION (n)

100* (6)

0 (8)

92* (13)

0 (8)

39 (18)

0 (6)

68* (37)

0 (22)

Reach

 Eligible Veteransa, n

236

151

271

210

489

206

996

567

 Received any MISSION-Vet sessions, % (n)

11.4* (27)

0

10.0* (27)

0

3.3 (16)

0

7.0* (70)

0

 Received 10% of MISSION-Vet sessionsb, % (n)

7.2* (17)

0

7.4* (20)

0

2.9 (14)

0

5.1* (51)

0

 Received 25% of MISSION-Vet sessionsb, % (n)

5.5* (13)

0

4.8* (13)

0

2.2 (11)

0

3.7* (37)

0

 Received 50% of MISSION-Vet sessionsb, % (n)

2.5 (6)

0

1.5 (4)

0

1.4 (7)

0

1.7* (17)

0

  1. aEligible Veterans were considered those who had a case manager consented into the study
  2. bThis is calculated by summing the number of unique DRT and peer sessions received by the total number available (13 DRT + 11 peer sessions = 24 available MISSION sessions)
  3. *Comparison with IU group is significant at the p < .05 level based on Fisher’s exact test and Bonferroni-adjusted p values