Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Describing knowledge encounters in healthcare: a mixed studies systematic review and development of a classification

Implementation Science201712:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0564-1

Received: 21 September 2016

Accepted: 1 March 2017

Published: 14 March 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Booth
9 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heather Colquhoun
29 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Dominic Hurst
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Booth
12 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Dominic Hurst
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13012-017-0564-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London
(2)
Griffith University
(3)
Gold Coast Health
(4)
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford

Advertisement