Skip to main content

Table 1 Associations grade 8 teachers’ implementation of booster sessions with student outcomes

From: Multi-year school-based implementation and student outcomes of an evidence-based risk reduction intervention

Variables

Number of activities in the booster session completed

F

Post-hoc comparisonb

0~1 activities

(1)

2~3 activities

(2)

4~5 activities

(3)

Sample size (n)a

296

1104

1705

  

HIV/AIDS knowledge (range 0~15 points)

10.45(2.39)

10.65(2.19)

10.85(2.12)

5.72**

(1,3) (2,3)

 High implementation group

10.85(1.99)

10.70(2.21)

10.87(2.08)

0.71

 

 Moderate implementation group

10.46(2.54)

10.73(2.09)

10.87(2.14)

2.37

 

 Low implementation group

9.55(2.40)

10.34(2.49)

10.78(2.04)

5.41**

(1,3)

Preventive reproductive health skills (range 0~6 points)

4.34(1.13)

4.37(1.15)

4.59(1.07)

16.95***

(1,3) (2,3)

 High implementation group

4.37(1.11)

4.42(1.15)

4.62(1.06)

4.88**

(2,3)

 Moderate implementation group

4.39(1.11)

4.39(1.14)

4.56(1.09)

4.67*

(2,3)

 Low implementation group

4.22(1.24)

4.34(1.22)

4.57(1.07)

3.82*

(1,3) (2,3)

Self-efficacy (range 0~3 points)

1.82(1.12)

1.95(1.12)

2.05(1.08)

6.43***

(1,3)

 High implementation group

1.94(1.06)

1.95(1.13)

2.09(1.06)

2.16

 

 Moderate implementation group

1.85(1.10)

1.96(1.09)

2.01(1.09)

1.44

 

 Low implementation group

1.39(1.30)

1.94(1.18)

2.01(1.11)

4.88**

(1,2) (1,3)

Intention to use protection (range 1~5 points)

3.81(1.63)

4.21(1.46)

4.17(1.47)

8.58**

(1,2) (1,3)

 High implementation group

4.12(1.49)

4.21(1.47)

4.07(1.55)

0.90

 

 Moderate implementation group

3.56(1.74)

4.18(1.47)

4.26(1.40)

13.41***

(1,2) (1,3)

 Low implementation group

3.97(1.46)

4.26(1.45)

4.10(1.52)

0.80

 
  1. *P < 0.05
  2. **P < 0.01
  3. ***P < 0.001
  4. a151 youth who did not identify their grade 8 teachers were excluded
  5. bNumbers in parentheses indicating significantly different groups based on post-hoc analysis