Study | Objective | Setting | Phase of intervention | Study design | Methods | Data collection | Data analysis | Unit of analysis | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bunger et al. [29] | To investigate how a learning collaborative focusing on trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy impacted advice seeking patterns between clinicians and key learning sources | Behavioral Health Agencies (USA) | Evaluation | Observational | Quantitative | Questionnaires | Social network analysis | Individual and organization | Change in professional networks |
Elouafkaoui et al. [33] | To analyze the impact of individualized audit and feedback interventions on dentists’ antibiotic prescribing rates | NHS general dental practices in Scotland | Implementation and evaluation | Experimental | Cluster randomized controlled trial; comparative effectiveness and process evaluation | Prescribing and claims data | Single principle analysis, analyses of covariance, intra-cluster correlations | Organization | Total number of antibiotic items dispensed per 100 NHS treatment claims over 12 months after intervention |
English [28] | To design an intervention to improve district hospital services for children | Hospitals (Kenya) | Design | Observational | N/A | Environmental scans/literature searches; a priori knowledge about context | Repeatedly moving backwards and forwards between identified causes, proposed interventions, identified theory, and knowledge of the existing context to develop the intervention | N/A | N/A |
Gould et al. [22]a | Design 2: theoretically enhanced audit and feedback interventions and investigate their feasibility and acceptability | Hospitals (England) | Feasibility assessment, piloting | Observational | Mixed | Study A: existing feedback documents (e.g., written reports, action planning templates) Study B: semi-structured interviews and observations Study C: semi-structured interviews, observations, surveys | Study A: structured content analysis Study B: qualitative case study analysis Study C: content analysis of interviews and descriptive statistics from questionnaires | Organization | Specific beliefs relating to ordering blood transfusion, determinants of implementation |
Graham-Rowe et al. [25]a | To identify and synthesize modifiable barriers and enablers in screening for diabetic retinopathy | Multiple | Evaluation | Systematic review | Systematic literature search | Qualitative and quantitative data extracted from identified literature | Theory-based structured content analysis | Individual and organization | The potential role and relative importance of each TDF and CFIR domain in influencing retinopathy screening attendance; plus variations in barriers and enablers across demographic groups |
Manca et al. [24]a | To implement and evaluate the Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care program | Primary care (Canada) | Evaluation | Observational | Mixed | Descriptive data; semi-structured interviews | Descriptive statistics; qualitative content analysis | Individual | Program reach, effectiveness, adoption, maintenance |
Moullin et al. [30] | To investigate professional service implementation in community pharmacy, to contextualize and advance a generic implementation framework | Community pharmacies (Australia) | Evaluation | Observational | Qualitative | Semi-structured one-on-one interviews | Framework analysis | Individual and organization | General themes surrounding the process of implementation, and influences on implementation |
Murphy et al. [27] | Design and implement a capacity-building program to enhance pharmacist’ roles in mental health care | Pharmacies (Canada) | Design | Observational | N/A | Environmental scans/literature searches; a priori knowledge about context | Identified target behavior, conducted a capability-opportunity-motivation and behavior assessment, and identified specific behavior change techniques | N/A | N/A |
Newlands et al. [31] | To elucidate barriers and facilitators of using local measures instead of prescribing antibiotics to manage dental infections | NHS general dental practices in (Scotland) | Evaluation | Observational | Qualitative | Semi-structured one-on-one interviews | Theory-based structured content analysis | Individual | Self-reported barriers and facilitators of using just local measures, and not antibiotics, to treat dental infections |
Prior et al. [23]a | Compare effectiveness of and evaluate processes associated with individualized audit and feedback strategies for translating evidence-based guidelines on antibiotic prescribing into dentistry practice | General dentist practices (Scotland) | Implementation | Experimental | Partial factorial cluster randomized controlled trial; comparative effectiveness, process evaluation | Claims data, semi-structured interviews | Analysis of covariance and content analysis | Organization | Number of antibiotic items dispensed, specific beliefs regarding prescribing behavior, barriers and facilitators to implementation |
Sales et al. [26]a | Determine the context, barriers, and facilitators to providing advanced care planning and goals of care conversations with veterans, to support providers in meeting a new system-wide mandate for these conversations | Veterans Affairs nursing homes, Veterans Affairs home-based primary care programs in five regional Veterans Affairs networks (USA) | Design and implementation | Observational | Mixed | Context and barrier and facilitator assessments | Interrupted time series/segmented regression analysis with matched comparisons | Individual and organization | (1) Proportion of veterans who have documented goals of care conversations after admission; (2) variation in goals of care conversation practice measures; (3) development of tools to improve implementing goals of care conversations |
Templeton et al. [32] | Identify patient-, organization-, and system-level factors influencing dental caries management | NHS primary care dentist offices in (Scotland) | Evaluation | Observational | Mixed | Questionnaires assessing current practices and beliefs sent to 651 dentists; eight in-depth case studies that observed routine dental visits and interviewed providers and patients | Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses, logistic regressions, and qualitative content analysis | Individual and organization | Perceptions of barriers and facilitators to improve caries prevention and management, from the point of view of patients, providers, the dental practices themselves and policy-makers |