Table 6 Results and secular trend on five general CR processes all centres received feedback upon: using MICE including correction for case mix and results on availability of five organizational structures
Care processes and organizational structures | Type | Crude baseline performance | Crude follow-up performance | Performance trend [OR (95% CI)] | N (centres) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indicators referring to general practices (both study groups) | |||||
18. Median time between hospital discharge and needs assessment procedure | Process | 68.0% (1983/2915) | 61.6% (7355/11,932) | 0.7 (0.54 to 0.91) | 14,847 (18) |
19. Patients are offered a rehabilitation plan tailored to their needs | Process | 85.0% (2479/2915) | 85.4% (10,191/11,932) | 0.89 (0.72 to 1.09) | 14,847 (18) |
20. Rehabilitation evaluated at discharge | Process | 39.0% (1137/2915) | 34.0% (4059/11,932) | 0.43 (0.28 to 0.64) | 14,847 (18) |
21. Cardiologist and GP receive a report after CR | Process | 42.5% (1239/2915) | 57.7% (6879/11,932) | 3.42 (2.24 to 5.24) | 14,847 (18) |
Availability of five organizational structures (both study groups) | |||||
22. Professionals work with a multidisciplinary patient record | Yes/no | 94.4% (17/18) | 100% (18/18) | N.A. | 18 |
23. Availability of specialized education for patients with chronic heart failure | Yes/no | 55.6% (10/18) | 61.1% (11/18) | N.A. | 18 |
24. Assessment of long-term patients outcomes | Yes/no | 33.3% (6/18) | 33.3% (6/18) | N.A. | 18 |
25. Performing internal evaluation and quality improvement | Yes/no | 83.3% (15/18) | 94.4% (17/18) | N.A. | 18 |
26. Performing patient satisfactory research | Yes/no | 44.4% (8/18) | 55.6% (10/18) | N.A. | 18 |