Skip to main content

Table 5 Effect on clinical performance measured by 11 care processes and six patient outcomes (primary outcome): complete case analysis including correction for case mix

From: Effect of a web-based audit and feedback intervention with outreach visits on the clinical performance of multidisciplinary teams: a cluster-randomized trial in cardiac rehabilitation

Care processes and patient outcomes

Type

Control group

Intervention group

P value

N (centres)

Missing values

Crude baseline performance

Crude follow-up performance

Adjusted performance trend [OR (95% CI)]

Crude baseline performance

Crude follow-up performance

Adjusted performance trend [OR (95% CI)]

Psychosocial rehabilitation (study group A)

ā€ƒ1. Complete data on psychological functioning

Process

67.1% (425/633)

70.4% (2703/3842)

0.56 (0.25 to 1.25)

86.8% (1474/1698)

85.6% (5495/6420)

0.82 (0.31 to 2.17)

0.690

12,593 (18)

0 (0%)

ā€ƒ2. Complete data on social functioning

Process

20.2% (128/633)

17.3% (666/3842)

0.14 (0.01 to 1.91)

56.2% (955/1698)

56.2% (3608/6420)

0.12 (0.01 to 1.95)

0.131

12,593 (18)

0 (0%)

ā€ƒ3. Complete data on lifestyle factors

Process

83.3% (527/633)

86.0% (3304/3842)

0.90 (0.45 to 1.83)

86.3% (1465/1698)

80.7% (5180/6420)

0.79 (0.32 to 1.98)

0.619

12,593 (18)

0 (0%)

ā€ƒ4. Disease specific education completeda

Process

36.3% (61/168)

46.5% (451/970)

0.59 (0.44 to 0.77)

48.9% (149/305)

69.4% (738/1064)

0.39 (0.26 to 0.60)

0

2507 (10)

1589 (38.8%)

ā€ƒ5. Lifestyle modification programme completeda

Process

51.4% (19/37)

42.7% (108/253)

0.63 (0.17 to 2.42)

21.3% (61/286)

33.3% (235/706)

1.24 (0.19 to 8.01)

0.819

1282 (9)

1541 (54.6%)

ā€ƒ6. Improved quality of live after CR

Outcome

47.0% (70/149)

48.8% (471/966)

1 (0.76 to 1.33)

46.6% (275/590)

49.0% (1182/2412)

0.96 (0.69 to 1.33)

0.793

4117 (17)

8476 (67.3%)

ā€ƒ7. Successful smoking cessation

Outcome

63.0% (63/100)

58.3% (277/475)

0.91 (0.65 to 1.29)

54.1% (119/220)

58.5% (424/725)

0.84 (0.56 to 1.26)

0.392

1520 (17)

11,073 (87.9%)

ā€ƒ8. Patients receive a discharge letter with remaining lifestyle goals

Process

9.1% (24/263)

17.8% (209/1173)

5.35 (0.58 to 49.38)

15.5% (161/1037)

26.7% (1004/3755)

2.06 (0.13 to 31.63)

0.609

6228 (18)

6365 (50.5%)

Physical rehabilitation (study group B)

ā€ƒ9. Complete data on physical functioning

Process

56.0% (950/1698)

64.1% (4118/6420)

1.66 (0.90 to 3.05)

57.8% (366/633)

67.8% (2605/3842)

0.97 (0.35 to 2.73)

0.956

12,593 (18)

0 (0%)

ā€ƒ10. Complete data concerning cardiovascular risk factors

Process

53.5% (909/1698)

48.6% (3123/6420)

1.13 (0.76 to 1.70)

54.8% (347/633)

62.9% (2415/3842)

0.86 (0.45 to 1.65)

0.657

12,593 (18)

0 (0%)

ā€ƒ11. Exercise training completeda

Process

55.0% (364/662)

50.2% (1124/2239)

1.17 (0.49 to 2.77)

75.0% (3/4)

NA (0/0)

0 (0 to Inf)

1

2905 (9)

2929 (50.2%)

ā€ƒ12. Relaxation and stress management training completeda

Process

35.0% (143/409)

51.4% (721/1404)

0.40 (0.09 to 1.72)

40.0% (6/15)

32.7% (145/443)

3.56 (0.16 to 79.38)

0.418

2271 (11)

518 (18.6%)

ā€ƒ13. Cardiovascular risk factors evaluated at discharge

Process

12.1% (156/1286)

8.8% (360/4085)

0.51 (0.10 to 2.66)

48.7% (218/448)

41.1% (970/2359)

0.49 (0.04 to 5.46)

0.567

8178 (18)

4415 (35.1%)

ā€ƒ14. Improvement in exercise capacity

Outcome

50.8% (199/392)

59.5% (966/1624)

1.14 (0.95 to 1.36)

57.1% (96/168)

51.0% (490/960)

1.22 (0.89 to 1.68)

0.224

3144 (12)

9449 (75.0%)

ā€ƒ15. Successful work resumption

Outcome

65.2% (204/313)

59.8% (539/901)

1.07 (0.80 to 1.44)

80.4% (86/107)

81.1% (456/562)

0.86 (0.51 to 1.46)

0.577

1883 (17)

10,710 (85.1%)

ā€ƒ16. Moderately active lifestyle norm met at discharge

Outcome

27.3% (229/839)

32.0% (781/2439)

1.45 (0.98 to 2.13)

75.9% (271/357)

75.7% (1249/1650)

1.26 (0.69 to 2.33)

0.457

5285 (17)

7308 (58.0%)

ā€ƒ17. Vigorously active lifestyle norm met at discharge

Outcome

9.2% (77/834)

19.2% (467/2438)

1.36 (1.04 to 1.79)

21.7% (74/341)

21.8% (354/1623)

1.32 (0.92 to 1.90)

0.129

5236 (17)

7357 (58.4%)

  1. Baseline period: first 3Ā months of study period; follow-up period: complete study period minus the baseline period. Performance trends: odds ratios associated with a 1-year study follow-up, adjusted for patientsā€™ age, gender, indication for CR, and centresā€™ type and size. P value: probability of trends being similar in intervention and control group
  2. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, CR cardiac rehabilitation, OR odds ratio, NA not applicable
  3. We excluded centres with incomplete data for this indicator. The number of centres and patients included in the analyses was therefore as follows: indicator 4: 12 centres, 11,174 patients; indicator 5: 15 centres, 12,649 patients; indicator 11: 16 centres, 12,915 patients; and indicator 12: 15 centres, 11,324 patients