Integrating evidence-based practices for increasing cancer screenings in safety net health systems: a multiple case study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Table 4 System-ordered matrix of magnitude and valence of intervention characteristics constructs by level of implementation

Construct	High level of implementation			Medium level of implementation			Low level of implementation			Distinguishing
Intervention characteristics	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I
Intervention source
Magnitude	Some	Some	Few	None	Few	Some	None	None	Few	No
Valence	+/−	0	0	~	+	+	~	~	+	No
Evidence strength and quality
Magnitude	Few	Some	Some	None	None	Some	Some	None	Few	No
Valence	+	0	+	~	~	+	+	~	+	No
Relative advantage
Magnitude	Some	Some	Few	Some	Many	Some	Few	Some	None	No
Valence	+	+/−	+	+	+/−	+	+	+	~	No
Adaptability
Magnitude	Some	Many	Some	None	Few	All	Few	Some	Some	Yes
Valence	+	+	+	~	+	+	+	+	+	Yes
Trialability
Magnitude	Some	Some	Few	None	Some	Some	None	None	Few	Yes
Valence	+	+	0	~	+	+	~	~	0	Yes
Complexity
Magnitude	Some	Some	Few	Some	Few	Few	Few	None	None	No
Valence	+/−	−	−	−	−	0	−	~	~	No
Design quality and packaging
Magnitude	Some	Some	Many	None	Few	Some	Few	Many	Few	Borderline
Valence	+/−	+	+	~	+	+	−	+/−	+	Borderline
Cost										No
Magnitude	None	None	Many	Some	Few	Few	Few	Some	Few
Valence	~	~	+	−	0	0	0	−	0

Notes on magnitude: none = 0, few = 1 = 25 %, some = 26–50 %, many = 51 = 75 %, most = 76–99 %, all = 100 % of transcripts in each system that mentioned the construct. Notes on valence: ~ = not applicable, 0 = descriptive only, + = positive, − = negative, +/− = mixed

ISSN: 1748-5908