Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of determinants and strategies identified by interviews before and after the delivery of the program

From: Process evaluation of five tailored programs to improve the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for chronic conditions in primary care

 

GE

PL

NW

UK

NL

All

% (n)

% (n)

% (n)

% (n)

% (n)

% (n)

Number of determinants identified after program delivery

32

8

24

10

15

89

 Thereof identified before

75 (24)

75 (6)

67 (16)

100 (10)

40 (6)

70 (62)

 Thereof prioritized (i.e., judged to be relevant and potentially modifiable)

69 (22)

38 (3)

29 (7)

80 (8)

0

45 (40)

 Thereof intended to be addressed by the program

50 (16)

38 (3)

25 (6)

80 (8)

0

37 (33)

Number of alternative strategies identified after program delivery

15

11

5

22

12

65

 Thereof identified before % (n)

67 (10)

18 (2)

80 (4)

46 (10)

75 (9)

54 (35)

 Thereof prioritized before (i.e., assessed as potentially effective and feasible, but not used in the final program)

20 (3)

18 (2)

0

18 (4)

33 (4)

20 (13)

Number and type of determinants not selected

 Patient factors

4

1

3

1

9

 Capacity for organizational change

1

2

1

4

 Incentives and resources

4

2

2

2

4

13

 Professional interactions

1

1

1

3

6

 Social, political, and legal factors

2

2

 Individual health care professional factors

6

1

8

1

16

 Not assigned to checklist

2

3

5

Number and type of strategies not prioritized

 Intervention development and delivery

6

3

9

 Change service sites

3

1

3

1

8

 Provision of materials

1

1

3

2

7

 Share local knowledge

2

1

2

1

6

 Change record systems

4

1

5

 Training

1

1

3

5

 Ongoing support

1

1

1

1

4

 Adaptions on patient level

2

2

 Revise professional roles

1

1

2

 Funding

1

1

2

 Provision of evidence

1

1

 External feedback

1

1

  1. This table shows the quantitative analysis of the qualitative data presented in Additional file 4