Skip to main content

Table 2 Impact of baseline role security and therapeutic commitment on the relative per cent difference in the proportion of patients receiving an intervention during the 12-week study period between providers that received the implementation component and providers that did not receive the implementation component

From: Impact of primary healthcare providers’ initial role security and therapeutic commitment on implementing brief interventions in managing risky alcohol consumption: a cluster randomised factorial trial

Implementation component

Basic model: brief intervention proportion difference (95 % CI; p value)a

Basic + RS + TC: brief intervention proportion difference (95 % CI; p value)a

Training and support (TS)

60.4

(14.5–124.8; 0.007)

62.5

(15.9–127.9; 0.005)

Financial reimbursement (FR)

68.8

(20.5–136.6; 0.003)

67.4

(19.4–134.7; 0.003)

e-BI

4.9

(−25.1–47; 0.78)

5.8

(−24.5–48.3; 0.741)

TS plus FR

170.7

(68.7–334.6; <0.001)

172.0

(69.3–337; <0.001)

TS plus e-BI

68.3

(4.1–172.2; 0.034)

71.9

(6.2–178.4; 0.028)

FR plus e-BI

77.1

(10.6–183.7; 0.018)

77.1

(10.6–183.7; 0.018)

TS plus FR plus e-BI

184.1

(59.2–407.0; 0.001)

187.8

(61.2–414; <0.001)

  1. RS role security; TC therapeutic commitment
  2. aAdjusted for baseline brief intervention rates and accounting for providers nested within PHCU nested within country
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908