Skip to main content

Table 2 TA and training hours in years 1 and 2

From: Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®

GTO steps Year 1b Year 2b Change from year 1 to year 2
M(SD) Hedges’ g (95 % CI) M(SD)b Hedges’ g (95 % CI) Hedges’ g (95 % CI) Generalized omega-squaredc
Control Intervention Control Intervention Control Intervention Difference of differences
1. Needs assessment 0 1.0(0.8) NA 0.1(0.1) 0.52(0.8)* 0.87 (0.12, 1.61) NA NA NA
2. Goals 0 0.9(0.7) NA 0.1(0.2) 0.89(0.8)** 1.43 (0.63, 2.23) NA NA NA
3. Best practicesa 4.5(7.6) 13.8(7.2)** 1.25 (0.48, 2.02) 7.8 (10.7) 20.2(19.6)* 0.88 (0.14, 1.63) 0.35 (–0.36, 1.06) 0.46 (–0.27, 1.18) −0.019
4. Fit 1.4(1.3) 3.4(1.7)*** 1.87 (1.02, 2.71) 0.7 (1.2) 2.1(1.8)* 1.03 (0.27, 1.79) −0.87 (−1.61, −0.14) −1.48 (−2.29, −0.67)*** 0.004
5. Capacity 0 3.7(4.6) NA 0.1 (0.2) 3.7(4.2)** 1.18 (0.41, 1.96) NA NA NA
6. Planning 2.2(2.0) 6.2(2.6)*** 1.87 (1.02, 2.71) 1.2 (1.3) 6.8(4.4)*** 1.80 (0.97, 2.62) −1.19 (−1.96, −0.43) 0.17 (−0.54, 0.89) 0.011
7. Process evaluation 0.1(0.1) 0.7(0.7)** 1.27 (0.50, 2.04) 0.1(0.3) 1.3(1.7)* 0.92 (0.16, 1.67) 0.90 (0.17, 1.64) 0.55 (−0.18, 1.28) 0.008
8. Outcome evaluation 0 0.3(0.6) NA 0.1(0.1) 0.9(1.2)** 1.10 (0.34, 1.87) NA NA NA
9. Continuous quality improvement 0 4.8(4.4) NA 2.3(2.1) 15.5(6.4)*** 2.77 (1.77, 3.77) NA NA NA
10. Sustainability 0 0.0(0.1) NA 0 0.4(1.1) NA NA NA NA
Total 8.2(7.9) 34.8(12.6) *** 2.63 (1.67, 3.59) 13.1(13.8) 64.2(26.7)*** 2.40 (1.46, 3.34) 0.35 (−0.36, 1.06) 1.33 (0.54, 2.12)*** 0.12***
  1. NA not applicable because that GTO step was not tested or because there was no variability
  2. *False discovery rate adjusted p < .05, significant at the 5 % level
  3. **p < .01, significant at the 1 % level
  4. ***p < .001, significant at the 0.1 % level
  5. aHours listed for step 3 are MPC training, the other steps are TA
  6. bTests comparing TA/training hours spent on the intervention vs. control group within year. Greater TA/training hours were spent on the intervention group where noted with asterisks
  7. cTests comparing TA/training hours spent between years 1 and 2 within and between groups. Differences in changes in TA/training hours spent are noted with asterisks