Skip to main content

Table 1 PC practice characteristics

From: Efficiency of the implementation of cardiovascular risk management in primary care practices: an observational study

Practice number Practice size Training practice Tasks CVRM practice nurse Mean age Sex (% men) Diabetes (% of patients with diabetes) Socio-economic statusa DEA scoreb
1 2473 No Yes 66.30 63.0 10.9 No 1.105
2 2460 Yes Yes 70.93 60.0 15.6 No 1
3 7500 Yes Yes 66.55 74.5 32.7 Yes 1.084
4 3230 No Yes 68.46 78.4 32.4 No 1
5 13,000 Yes Yes 71.04 72.5 24.9 No 1.089
6 2600 Yes Yes 67.68 52.5 17.5 No 1.004
7 4600 Yes Yes 73.55 64.5 22.6 Yes 1.057
8 12,700 Yes Yes 68.79 61.8 17.6 No 1.026
9 3400 No Yes 66.76 69.6 28.3 No 1.092
10 3000 No Yes 64.44 47.2 16.7 No 1.059
11 5300 Yes No 66.49 79.1 25.6 No 1.010
12 4400 Yes Yes 68.43 73.5 6.0 No 1.035
13 6800 Yes Yes 67.57 62.9 0 No 1.042
14 3500 Yes Yes 66.27 63.6 0 No 1
15 3200 Yes Yes 65.53 70.6 14.7 No 1
16 2650 Yes Yes 70.31 61.9 21.4 No 1.047
17 2500 No No 69.90 68.8 37.5 No 1
18 4100 Yes Yes 72.47 64.4 4.4 No 1.078
19 2998 No No 66.90 59.0 2.6 No 1.049
20 2245 Yes Yes 61.40 80.0 33.3 Yes 1.005
21 2820 Yes Yes 69.71 60.5 26.3 No 1
22 2900 Yes No 65.00 71.9 18.8 No 1.025
23 2286 Yes Yes 72.40 68.0 12.0 No 1
24 2475 Yes Yes 66.29 45.7 31.4 No 1.012
25 1900 No Yes 65.13 37.5 50.0 Yes 1.014
26 2600 Yes No 69.32 38.7 35.5 No 1
27 2650 No Yes 57.00 75.0 25.0 Yes 1
28 2640 No Yes 75.00 57.6 15.2 No 1.036
29 3600 Yes Yes 68.82 78.9 5.3 No 1
30 4900 Yes No 67.52 73.9 13.0 No 1.000
31 2620 Yes Yes 68.25 67.9 17.9 No 1.004
32 8000 Yes Yes 69.84 64.9 16.2 No 1
33 2758 No Yes 65.87 82.6 15.2 No 1.009
34 3018 Yes Yes 67.21 70.6 32.4 No 1
35 2648 Yes Yes 71.94 62.9 17.1 No 1
36 3400 Yes Yes 69.71 58.5 17.1 No 1
37 2600 No Yes 67.94 57.6 6.1 No 1.120
38 6550 Yes Yes 67.64 66.7 24.0 Yes 1.111
39 1850 Yes Yes 72.33 61.5 30.8 No 1.045
40 7000 Yes Yes 66.94 94.4 8.3 No 1
41 2600 Yes Yes 72.50 70.6 14.7 No 1.039
  1. aWhether or not a practice is located in a disadvantaged neighbourhood
  2. bOutput-oriented Farrell technical efficiency scores