Characterizing patient-oriented tools that could be packaged with guidelines to promote self-management and guideline adoption: a meta-review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick McGowan|
|15 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Monika kastner|
|29 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Robin Vernooij|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Monika kastner|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Apr 2016||Editorially accepted|
|14 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13012-016-0419-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.