Skip to main content

Table 2 Determinants of self-management behaviour and behaviour change techniques

From: Using intervention mapping to develop a theory-driven, group-based complex intervention to support self-management of osteoarthritis and low back pain (SOLAS)

Determinants of self-management behaviour

Needs assessment component that provided evidence of the determinant

TDF domain

Behaviour change techniques as per behaviour change technique taxonomy v1 (Michie et al. [42, 44])

Self efficacy

Systematic reviews of mediators for SM behaviour in CMP including OA, CLBP [48, 49]

Beliefs about capabilities

To improve participants’ perceived competence to use each SM behaviour

1.2. Problem solving

2.2 Feedback on behavioura

2.3. Self-monitoring of behaviour

2.7 Feedback on outcome of behaviour

3.1. Social support (unspecified)

3.2. Social support (practical)

3.3. Social support (emotional)

8.1 Behavioural practice/rehearsal

8.7 Graded tasks

12.5 Adding objectives to the environment

15.1. Verbal persuasion about capabilitya

Catastrophizinga

Systematic reviews of mediators of CLBP outcomes [48, 50]

CLBP guidelines [47]

Beliefs about consequences

To reduce negative expectancies (catastrophizing) about consequences of engaging in specific SM behaviours

2.2 Feedback on behavioura

2.3. Self-monitoring of behaviour

2.7 Feedback on outcome of behaviour

5.1 Information re health consequences of behaviour

5.6 Information re emotional consequences of behaviour

9.1. Credible source

Fear

Systematic reviews of mediators of CLBP outcomes [51]

CLBP guidelines [47]

Focus groups barrier to patient participation to be addressed within intervention

Emotion

To reduce negative emotional responses (fear) of specific SM behaviours

3.3 Social support—emotional

5.6 Information re emotional consequences of behaviour

11.2 Reduce negative emotions

Knowledge

Conceptual definition of SM [12]

Focus groups barrier to patient participation to be addressed within intervention

Knowledge

To increase participants knowledge for each SM behaviour

2.2 Feedback on behavioura

2.7 Feedback on outcome of behaviour

4.2 Information about antecedents of behaviour

5.1 Information about the health consequences of behaviour

Skills

Conceptual definition of SM [12]

Focus groups barrier to patient participation to be addressed within intervention

Skills

To develop participants proficiency to uptake each SM behaviour

1.1. Goal setting (behaviour)

1.2. Problem solving

1.3. Goal setting (outcome)

2.3. Self-monitoring of behaviour

4.1 Instruction on how to perform the behaviour

6.1. Demonstration of the behaviour

8.1 Behavioural practice/rehearsal

8.6 Generalisation of the targeted behaviour

8.7 Graded tasks

11.1 Pharmacological support

13.2 Framing/reframing

12.6 Body changes

Motivationa

Review of behaviour change theories [41], evidence of effectiveness in group interventions [58–61] and target patient and physiotherapist groups in Ireland [67, 68]

Focus groups and manager interviews potential barrier to patient participation to be addressed within intervention

Intentions and goals

To improve autonomous motivation of participants to engage in each SM behaviour

1.1 Goal setting (behaviour)

1.2 Problem solving

1.3. Goal setting (outcome)

1.4 Action planning

1.5 Review behavioural goal

1.6 Discrepancy between current behaviour and goal

1.7 Review outcome goal

1.8 Behavioural contracta

3.1. Social support (unspecified)

3.2. Social support (practical)

3.3. Social support (emotional)

5.1 Information about health consequences

6.2 Social comparison

8.7 Graded tasks

9.1. Credible source

10.4 Social rewards

Behaviour regulation

Advice from behaviour change expert (S Dean)

Focus groups barrier to patient participation to be addressed within intervention

Behavioural regulation

Strategies to manage or change objectively observed or measured SM behaviour of participants

2.3 Self-monitoring of behaviour

  1. aAbsent from FASA