Skip to main content

Table 2 An overview of the 18 CKD interventions for primary care identified from the primary search

From: Understanding the implementation of interventions to improve the management of chronic kidney disease in primary care: a rapid realist review

 

Intervention type

Author (year)

Main intervention description

Other intervention(s)

Sample size

Country

Summary of findings

Other comments

CKD interventions aimed at healthcare professionals

Educational

Cortes-Sanabria et al. (2008) [28]

Intensive weekly teaching sessions to GP (5 h weekly for 6 months)

Validated test at 0 and 6 months to measure competence

94

Mexico

Increased GP competence, led to improved eGFR and BP control, better prescribing

High enrolment rate. 91 % of GPs increased their clinical competence

Akbari et al. (2004) [26]

2 h of teaching seminars to GPs, with direct access to advice from nephrologist

Automated reporting of eGFR by laboratory

324

Canada

Increased recognition of CKD

Limited data for evaluation, early study

Practice group meetings

De Lusignan et al. (2013) [34]

Audit-based education (twice yearly feedback about quality and performance compared with peers)

Education, peer support

23,311

UK

Improved BP control and increased use of ACEi. No differences in eGFR

Large study including 93 different practices

Humphreys et al. (2012) [16]

Three large practice group meetings with local rapid quality improvement cycles (planned and organised by research collaboration)

Implementation team support

5509

UK

CKD recognition, BP control and proteinuria testing all improved

Included 19 different practices

Multidisciplinary management

Scherpbier et al. (2013) [32]

Shared care between nurse practitioners and GPs (with access to nephrologist or nephrology nurse via digital technology)

Education to both groups

164

Holland

Decreased BP and serum PTH, increased use of ACEi and statins

Limited supporting data for evaluation

Barrett et al. (2011) [25]

Nurse co-ordinated care (with access to nephrologist)

 

427

Canada

No difference in rate of decline of eGFR or BP. But an increase in mean eGFR

Most patients ‘extremely satisfied’ with care on questionnaire

Bayliss et al. (2011) [27]

MDT approach (including nephrologist, pharmacy specialist, diabetes educator, dietitian, social worker, and nephrology nurse)

Components included weekly meetings, contact by telephone or email, individualised plans and patient education

2002

USA

Rate of decline of eGFR improved. No differences in BP, lipids or HbA1C

Limited data to determine which individual components were effectual

Richards et al. (2008) [33]

Disease management programme (includes patient education, medication review, dietetic advice and social worker)

Desktop guide for clinicians containing clinical management and referral algorithms

483

UK

Improved eGFR, BP and cholesterol.

An extra resource. 85 % enrolment of practices within one area

Patel et al. (2005) [45]

Pharmacists performing medication reviews

 

82

USA

Improvement of CKD recognition. No difference in BP, HbA1C or creatinine clearance

99 % of patients had prescription related problems. Only 40.9 % of advice was accepted

Computer software

Drawz et al. (2012) [36]

Access and training for CKD registries

Educational lecture to both groups, academic detailing

781

USA

Increased PTH measurements, but no difference in BP control

Poor uptake: only 5/37 GPs accessed the registry

Erler et al. (2012) [35]

Medication alert software with training

1 h education to both groups, patient info leaflets

404

Germany

Improved prescribing

Lack of contextual integration limited its use

Abdel Kader et al. (2011) [23]

Computer-generated automatic alerts for referral to nephrologist

Two 15 min educational sessions for GPs in both groups

248

USA

No differences in referral to nephrologists or BP control

97 % uptake rate of GPs. No dropouts from study

Fox et al. (2008) [30]

Computer decision support software generating a recommended to-do list

Ancillary staff + monthly academic detailing

180

USA

Mean eGFR, CKD recognition, anaemia diagnosis all improved

Ancillary staff also did extra work including translating patient guides

Financial

Karunaratne et al. (2013) [29]

National pay for performance scheme (Quality and Outcomes Framework)

 

10,040

UK

Improved BP control, increased use of ACEi

High level buy-in generated engagement

CKD interventions aimed at patients

Patient education

Blakeman et al. (2014) [39]

Patient guidebook, telephone guided help from a lay health worker

Booklet and website linking to community resources

436

UK

Improved BP control, increased QALYs

85.7 % uptake rate

Thomas et al. (2013) [38]

Leaflet, DVD, self-monitoring diary

Single practitioner education and shadowing session

116

UK

Decreased BP

Limited data on level of implementation

Thomas et al. (2014) [37]

Group education session, leaflet, DVD

Practice training and monthly teleconferences. Patient advisory group

671

UK

Moderate decreases in BP

Patient advisory group involved in design, grant application, delivering education and feedback

Other

Cottrell et al. (2012) [44]

Mobile phone text messaging BP service

 

124

UK

No changes in BP, improved prescribing

Many more BP readings

  1. Abbreviations: GP general practitioner, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, BP blood pressure, CKD chronic kidney disease, ACEi angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, PTH parathyroid hormone, HbA1C glycated haemoglobin, QALYs quality-adjusted life years