Model A: model predicting retentiona | |||
Odds ratio | 95 % confidence interval | p value | |
A1. Without baseline LHA activity | |||
Type of institution | |||
Academic | Reference | – | 0.003 |
Non-academic | 0.16 | (0.05, 0.55) | |
Length in program | 0.99 | (0.98, 0.99) | 0.03 |
Role expectations (clarity and commitment) | 5.73 | (1.43, 22.9) | 0.01 |
A2. Adjusting for baseline LHA activity | |||
Type of institution | |||
Academic | Reference | – | 0.0005 |
Non-academic | 0.022 | (0.002, 0.19) | |
Baseline activity level | |||
Active | 62.7 | (6.29, 579) | 0.0003 |
Inactive | Reference | – | |
Model B: model predicting high/moderate activity levelsb | |||
Odds ratio | 95 % confidence interval | p value | |
B1. Without baseline LHA activity | |||
Type of Institution | |||
Academic | Reference | – | 0.009 |
Non-academic | 0.21 | (0.06, 0.67) | |
Self efficacy (overall) | 12.7 | (1.31, 123) | 0.03 |
Religiosity | 0.8 | (0.64, 0.99) | 0.05 |
B2. Adjusting for baseline LHA activity | |||
Type of Institution | |||
Academic | Reference | – | 0.0002 |
Non-academic | 0.05 | (0.01, 0.24) | |
Religiosity | 0.70 | (0.52, 0.95) | 0.02 |
Baseline activity level | |||
Active | 59.2 | (9.56, 367) | <0.0001 |
Inactive | Reference | – |