Skip to main content

Table 4 Ranking of 14 strategies by percentage in favor of each strategy with respect to the question “What are the current ways being used to bridge the gap between science and policy?” in the China-Canada survey 2012

From: Bridging the gap between science and policy: an international survey of scientists and policy makers in China and Canada

Strategy

China and Canada n = 207 (100 %)

China n = 121 (100 %)

Canada n = 86 (100 %)

p value (China vs. Canada)

a. Collaboration in study design

No. 7, 77 (37 %)

No. 7, 51 (42 %)

No. 9, 26 (30 %)

n.s.

b. Focus on policy

No. 1, 117 (57 %)

No. 1, 73 (60 %)

No. 2, 44 (51 %)

n.s.

c. Policy briefs

No. 3, 97 (47 %)

No. 3, 61 (50 %)

No. 5, 36 (42 %)

n.s.

d. Web-based portals

No. 11, 46 (22 %)

No. 11, 20 (17 %)

No. 9, 26 (30 %)

p < 0.05*

e. Email updates

No. 13, 33 (16 %)

No. 13, 16 (13 %)

No. 13, 17 (20 %)

n.s.

f. Journal publications

No. 9, 65 (31 %)

No. 10, 28 (23 %)

No. 4, 37 (43 %)

p < 0.01**

g. Conferences

No. 3, 97 (47 %)

No. 4, 59 (49 %)

No. 3, 38 (44 %)

n.s.

h. Policy recommendations

No. 5, 85 (41 %)

No. 6, 56 (46 %)

No. 7, 29 (34 %)

n.s.

i. Science-policy forums

No. 2, 112 (54 %)

No. 2, 65 (54 %)

No. 1, 47 (55 %)

n.s.

j. Joint research projects

No. 5, 85 (41 %)

No. 5, 58 (48 %)

No. 8, 27 (31 %)

p < 0.05*

k. Personal contact

No. 8, 70 (34 %)

No. 9, 35 (29 %)

No. 6, 35 (41 %)

n.s.

l. Knowledge brokers

No. 12, 41 (20 %)

No. 12, 19 (16 %)

No. 11, 22 (26 %)

n.s.

m. Collaboration in analysis

No. 10, 61 (29 %)

No. 8, 40 (33 %)

No. 12, 21 (24 %)

n.s.

n. Co-authorship

No. 14, 8 (4 %)

No. 14, 3 (2 %)

No. 14, 5 (6 %)

n.s.

No opinion

9 (4 %)

5 (4 %)

4 (5 %)

n.s.

  1. n.s. non-significant
  2. *p < 0.05 (two-sided), **p < 0.01 (two-sided)